I support the publication of this document. Now, I think that this PCEP extension should not be limited to RSVP-TE LSPs only. I know that colour is inherent to SR-Policy/CP and that PCEP extensions defined in draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp already cover this aspect, but there are SR-TE implementations out there that follow RFCs 8231, 8281, and 8664 that may want to add support for colour without having to implement support for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp.
Cheers. Diego. From: Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, June 15, 2024 at 21:24 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: pce-chairs <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [Pce] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-04 CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Hi WG, Reminder to respond to this WGLC poll. Please be more explicit in your support (or not) for publishing this I-D by responding on the mailing list. Silence makes it hard to judge consensus. Thanks! Dhruv On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:20 AM Dhruv Dhody <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi WG, This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-04. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color/ Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. The WG LC will end on Tuesday 18 June 2024. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
