Hi Cheng,

Sorry for the late reply!

This is a good question and I had proposed this issue when I replied the 
adoption call.

I think it is appropriate to carry the information  using PCEP-LS encoding such 
as the LS object.
These TLV extensions is used to advertise the PCE-controlled ID spase to a PCE 
and the LS Object is also used to report the information to a PCE. 
And both the two drafts are experimental.


Thanks,
Quan




<Echo request 😊

<Hope to have your valuable suggestions!

<Thanks,
<Cheng


<From: Cheng Li "><[email protected]>Sent: Thursday, June 20, 
2024 11:46 AM
<To: [email protected]: [Pce] Where the Controlled ID info shuold be 
carried/encoded?

<Hi Guys,

<Thank you so much for your helpful review and comments of our draft 
draft-ietf-pce-controlled-id-space.
<In the WG adoption, I can summarize our discussion into the below bullets, 
hope they are correct,

< 1. The draft is useful, and the mechanism defined in the draft is needed, we 
should work on it. (Thanks!)
< 2. We need to discuss the where the info should be carried in the PCEP. Open 
Object seems not so good ☹
< 3. TLV encoding should be updated to be more generic or let's avoid the 
generic description and define specific sub-TLVs as needed.

<I see the reasons why we decided to carry the info in PCEP Open Object, 
because it is a device-wide configuration info, which should not be modified in 
the running state. We may face a lot of trouble of removing some IDs and then 
modify the range in a running network. However, we may also need to handle the 
negotiation between PCC and PCE? Therefore, I am also concerning about this.

I like to hear your voice on this, which object/msg is appropriate to carry the 
info? I am open with other options.

Possible options could be

l Open message

l Use PCEP-LS encoding and make this a node attribute

l New type of notification

l New message/object

Once we get the conclusion of this, we can go to the bullet 3, which is much 
easier that bullet 2. IMHO, I will prefer to define sub-TLVs one by one, this 
can decouple the relations between IDs, though we may need to delete the 
'generic' words.

Thoughts?
Cheng
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to