Hi Authors, I think you might have overlooked replying to Murray’s question.
—John > On Aug 22, 2024, at 2:39 AM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-34: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CB1o2jlxBvTh_Pxjyzg_DCX1oY1AUsUhpAhzalTBCr84oba8fUeDGriejxGLpyCDl4PbiJ1u4pva$ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CB1o2jlxBvTh_Pxjyzg_DCX1oY1AUsUhpAhzalTBCr84oba8fUeDGriejxGLpyCDl4PbiLZbCgGX$ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The SHOULD in Section 10 and the RECOMMENDED in Section 7.3 seem to be > unsupported. Why might an implementer choose not to do what they say? What's > the impact to interoperability? > > I echo Roman's question about the document's status. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
