Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-12 Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education). Special thanks to Dhruv Dhody for the shepherd's write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status. Other thanks to Wassim Haddad, the Internet directorate reviewer (at my request), please consider this int-dir review: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-09-intdir-telechat-haddad-2024-10-22/ (and I have read the email discussion with the authors) I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric # COMMENTS (non-blocking) ## Lack of contributor section Based on https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-16&url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-12&difftype=--html I find rather weird not to acknowledge Dhruv contributions rather than simply acknowledging Dhruv 'for their suggestions'. I find it a little short even if Dhruv is listed in appendix A 'contributor addresses'. As Dhruv is also the document shepherd, I will assume that Dhruv is OK with the situation. ## Section 1 As I am not a PCE expert, it took me three readings of the last two paragraphs of the introduction to understand what this I-D actually specifies. Unsure how to rewrite it though, perhaps explaining what is the need ? _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
