Hi Samuel/WG,

Thanks for following up on this point.

As I had mentioned in my review, it is problematic to specify anything
concretely for Algos 2 to 127. This is because they are subject to what may
be specified by future documents (i.e., in LSR WG). Therefore, from a
protocol correctness perspective, please consider making only suggestions
or bringing up the idea that SID filtering can be applied to those algos,
but leave it to future specs to actually specify such behavior.

I hope you can consider this as well.

Thanks,
Ketan


On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 3:05 PM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <ssidor=
40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi PCE WG,
>
>
>
> During the AD review of the PCEP SID Algorithm draft, comment was raised
> by Ketan (thank you for detailed review) related to benefits of SID
> filtering for the Flex-Algo range of SR-Algorithms.
>
> After discussions with the co-authors, we have decided to limit the use of
> SID filtering to the *non-Flex-Algo range* of SR-Algorithms. As a result:
>
>    - *SID Filtering*: Applicable only to *SR-Algorithm values 0-127*:
>
>    
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-19.html#name-path-computation-with-sid-f
>    
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-19.html#name-path-computation-with-sid-f%22%20t>
>    - *Flex-Algo Path Computation*: Applicable to *SR-Algorithm values
>    128-255*:
>
>    
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-19.html#name-flexible-algorithm-path-com
>    
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-sid-algo-19.html#name-flexible-algorithm-path-com%22%20t>
>
> As a result of this change, the *F flag* in the SR-Algorithm TLV will no
> longer be required. This flag was originally introduced to allow the
> Flex-Algo range to be used with both - SID filtering and Flex-Algo path
> computation.
>
> We believe this change simplifies the specification and improves clarity
> while maintaining the intended functionality of the draft.
>
>
>
> If you have any concerns or objections to this proposed change, please
> respond to the mailing list by *17th June*.
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Samuel
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to