Hi Aijun, Thanks for your suggestion, we will add some text about this in next revision.
Best regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: Aijun Wang <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2025 9:19 AM > To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Pce] Re: Adoption Poll for draft-dong-pce-pcep-nrp > > Hi, Jie: > > I think it will be better to add some descriptions that you explained in the > mail into the document, and also how the mapping information being > coordinated between the PCC and PCE. > > Best Regards > > Aijun Wang > China Telecom > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dongjie (Jimmy) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 2:42 PM > To: Aijun Wang <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Pce] Re: Adoption Poll for draft-dong-pce-pcep-nrp > > Hi Aijun, > > Thanks for your review and support. > > Regarding your question about the NRP identification, the 32-bit NRP ID in > this document is an identifier in the control plane, while the resource-aware > SR SIDs or the NRP Selector ID are carried in the data packets. There is > mapping between them, while they don't have to be exact the same in size > and encoding. > > Hope this addresses your question. > > Best regards, > Jie > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Aijun Wang <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 10:49 AM > > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: [Pce] Re: Adoption Poll for draft-dong-pce-pcep-nrp > > > > Hi, All: > > > > I review this document and support its adoption. > > > > One question for the contents of the document, in the introduction > > part this document, it says there are several methods to identify on > > NRP, for example, the SR/SRv6 SID, or VPN-VTN-ID etc. > > So, can the 32 bit NRP ID encompass all these situations? For example, > > the > > SRv6 SID is 16 bytes length, how to encapsulate it into the newly > > defined NRP TLV? > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Aijun Wang > > China Telecom > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > On Behalf Of [email protected] > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2025 8:14 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dong-pce-pcep-nrp > > > > Hi all, > > > > This message starts an adoption poll for draft-dong-pce-pcep-nrp-04 [1]. > > @WG members: do you think this document is a correct foundation to > > become a PCE WG work item? > > Please respond using the PCE mailing list, including rationale if you > > believe it isn't ready. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > -- > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-pce-pcep-nrp/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
