Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-22: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke INT AD comments for draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-22 CC @evyncke Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below some blocking DISCUSS points (easy to address), some non-blocking COMMENT points/nits (replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education). I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric Note: this ballot comments follow the Markdown syntax of https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/tree/main, i.e., they can be processed by a tool to create github issues. ## DISCUSS (blocking) As noted in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-handling-ballot-positions-20220121/, a DISCUSS ballot is a request to have a discussion on the points below; I really think that the document would be improved with a change here, but can be convinced otherwise. ### Section 2 I am afraid that a document cannot define "LSP" as in RFC 3031 (which is only about MPLS), then add a note explaining that SRv6 SID list can be shoehorned in the MPLS LSP. Consider rewriting this section without mentionning RFC 3031. If reference to RFC 3031 is kept, then it must be normative and not informative as in the current I-D. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Abstract Strongly suggest rewriting the abstract as it is mostly unreadable (is the first paragraph required?). ## NITS (very cosmetic) ### Use of SVG graphics To make a much nicer HTML rendering, suggest using the aasvg tool to generate SVG graphics. It is worth a try especially if the I-D uses the Kramdown file format ;-) _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
