Hi Dimitri, Thank you for your comments.
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:23:06 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > folks > > reading this document the vnt functionality communicates with the pce; > nevertheless it seems the operations the former allows are setup/triggers > (note that the triggers are not exclusively coming from a pce/going toward > a pce as the draft indicates, a simple lsr with could do the job), > resource/ advertisement policing, etc. i.e. functions that are stricto > sensu decoupled from pce ... hence shouldn't this document be not Yes, that is correct. The VNT Manager's job is to manage the VNT. This does not require PCE to be used to provide the trigger/notification and it does not require PCE to be used to compute paths in the lower layer network. > discussed in the context of the ccamp wg (as a vnt operations are > independent of the presence of a pce, presence of the latter wrt to vnt is > similar to the presence of a pce wrt to lsrs) ? > It is not our intention in this draft to provide a full framework and definition for VNT Manager. Instead, as the title of the draft shows, we want to define VNT manager for use in the PCE context. We would be happy to work with you on another draft to provide a definition of VNT manager with a wider scope. Thank you. Eiji > thanks, > - dimitri. > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
