o) on the I flag issue is identical why include an object
which has not considered during computation ?
I don't catch your point, the PCC may want to know the
constraints that were not taken into account during path
computation, this sounds quite important isn'it?
there are so
many things that the PCE has not taken into account during
computation so why bother ?
Hum I don't follow you here "there are so many things...",
What do you mean?
I think the disconnect is that the I flag is only used in constraints
*returned* to the PCC. I.e. in constraints that formed part of the original
request, but were ignored. There is no requirement (or desire?) for the PCE
to randomly report other things it did not take into account (such as
weather, shoe-size of operator, etc.)
Adrian
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
