Hi JP, 

Thanks for your clarifications.
Please ignore my last question. 

Thank you.
Eiji

On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:18:05 -0500
JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Eiji,
> 
> On Oct 24, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Eiji Oki wrote:
> 
> > Hi JP,
> >
> > The ID looks very great.
> 
> Thanks for your feed-back.
> 
> >
> > I have several comments.
> >
> > 1. Section 3.2: The last sentense
> >    The SVEC, RP, END-POINTS, LSPA, BANDWIDTH, METRIC, ERO, IRO and  
> > LOAD-
> >    BALANCING objects are defined in [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep].
> > is not neccessary, as these objects do not appear in PCMonRep.
> >
> 
> Indeed, it has been removed, thanks.
> 
> > 2. Section 4.1 describes
> >    P (Processing Time) - 1 bit: the P bit of the MONITORING object
> >    carried in a PCMonReq message is set to indicate that the  
> > processing...
> >
> > "or a PCReq message" would be added after "a PCMonReq message".
> >
> 
> Good catch, added, thanks.
> 
> > 3. Section 4.3 describes
> >    When the processing time is requested in addition to a path
> >    computation, the PROC-TIME object always report the actual  
> > processing
> >    time for that request and thus the E bits MUST be cleared.
> >
> > Is it possible to define "actulal" Min- Max- Average- procssing time
> > with E=0?
> 
> No because for the Min, Max, Average and Variance the values are  
> computed based on some history, they're not estimated. The case of an  
> estimated metric is when the request relates to a particular TE LSP  
> path computation (as opposed to a general request). I clarified:
> "When a request is specific (related to a particular TE LSP path  
> computation), the G bit MUST be cleared and the Min-processing-time,  
> Max-processing-time, Average-processing-time and Variance-processing- 
> time MUST be set to 0x00000000."
> 
> > Otherwise, when E is cleared, Min- Max- Average- procssing
> > time MUST be set to 0x00000000. In other words,
> > If the G flag of the MONITORING object is set then E bit MUST be  
> > cleared.
> > Please clarify it.
> >
> 
> Yes, actually there's no such E bit for the Min, Max, Average and  
> Variance (removed). The E bit is only relevant for specific request  
> for which the G bit is cleared.
> 
> Does that clarify ?
> 
> > 4. Section 4.1
> >
> >   C (Check) - 1 bit: when set, this indicates that the performance
> >    metric of interest is the PCE's availability.
> >
> > What does the PCE's availablity mean?
> 
> This is a way to ensure that the PCE is alive. This way, you can for  
> example, check a path computation chain by specifying a set of PCE- 
> ID. I will replace "availability" by "liveness".
> 
> > If a specific TE LSP computation is requested, does it mean that  
> > PCE has
> > the ability to compute the path with the specified constraints?
> 
> Yes indeed, in this case a PCC can request the computation of a path  
> + gather the processing time on each hop.
> 
> > In case of the general computation, does it mean that PCE is alive or
> > not?
> > Please clarify it.
> 
> I'm not sure to see your question ?
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> JP.
> 
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Eiji
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:30:06 -0400
> > JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> See below a new ID related to the monitoring of PCE-based path
> >> computation architecture so as to required various performance
> >> metrics such as liveness verification of the various elements of a
> >> path computation chain, processing time spent on path computation at
> >> each hop (for performance monitoring or troubleshooting, ...).
> >>
> >> Comments and opinions are most welcome.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> JP.
> >>
> >>
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Date: October 20, 2006 2:50:01 AM EDT
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-01.txt
> >>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >>> directories.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   Title           : A set of monitoring tools for Path Computation Element
> >>> based Architecture
> >>>   Author(s)       : J. Vasseur
> >>>   Filename        : draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-01.txt
> >>>   Pages           : 16
> >>>   Date            : 2006-10-19
> >>>   
> >>> A Path Computation Element (PCE) based architecture has been
> >>>    specified for the computation of Traffic Engineering (TE) Label
> >>>    Switched Paths (LSPs) in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and
> >>>    Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks in the context of single or
> >>>    multiple domains (where a domain is referred to as a  
> >>> collection of
> >>>    network elements within a common sphere of address management or
> >>> path
> >>>    computational responsibility such as IGP areas and Autonomous
> >>>    Systems).  In such PCE-based environment it is thus critical to
> >>>    monitor the state of the path computation chain and potentially
> >>>    gather various performance metrics with regards to the set of
> >>>    involved PCE(s) that can be used for performance monitoring and
> >>>    troubleshooting purposes.  This document specifies procedures and
> >>>    extensions to the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) in  
> >>> order
> >>>    to gather such information.
> >>>
> >>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vasseur-pce-
> >>> monitoring-01.txt
> >>>
> >>> To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a message to
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the  
> >>> body of
> >>> the message.
> >>> You can also visit https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D- 
> >>> announce
> >>> to change your subscription settings.
> >>>
> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the
> >>> username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After
> >>> logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then
> >>> "get draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-01.txt".
> >>>
> >>> A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
> >>> http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> >>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> >>>
> >>> Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.
> >>>
> >>> Send a message to:
> >>>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> In the body type:
> >>>   "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-01.txt".
> >>>   
> >>> NOTE:     The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
> >>>   MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
> >>>   feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
> >>>   command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
> >>>   a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail  
> >>> readers
> >>>   exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
> >>>   "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
> >>>   up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
> >>>   how to manipulate these messages.
> >>>
> >>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> >>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> >>> Internet-Draft.
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain
> >>> Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> I-D-Announce mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> >>
> 


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to