adrian - see inline: > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 12:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Pce] Acceptance of draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring-03.txt ? > > Hi, > > Some time back we had a relatively good show of support for > draft-vasseur-pce-monitoring as a working group I-D. > > There are still some questions being raised, but in my > opinion, that is > fine. We expect questions, discussions, and modifications of > the draft in > its lifetime within the working group. > > However, since we all expressed our opinions on the draft, JP > has drawn our > attention to the IPR claim registered at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/872/. So, before we go ahead > and adopt the > work, I just need to check that there is no new strong > opinion against it.
-> the question is what is the object of the support that we have seen on the list ? the need for monitoring of the performance or the solution ? => both aspects are strongly inter-related. > I'll give you a few days to respond. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
