Ive been debating whether I should bother with
such a card, and since I dont do anything 3d
(games, graphic programs) I will probably not
get the card!

Your testing is appreciated!

Edgar
8600/g4 800, 512 RAM, audiophile 2496, belkin usb
cards, old old Rasterops 20" monitor 5bnc vga


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A number of you, like me have wondered about the ATI
> cards in our PCI Macs, 
> and the low benchmarks, etc. I got an ATI Radeon
> card, and finally resolved 
> all the issues (Can't open ATI display control
> panel) and also did my own 
> testing, using Nortons, Throughput, MacBench 3.0 a
> stopwatch, and my eyes. 
> First off, let me say that my expectations were
> obviously way to high. For 
> most stuff, I see no speedup. However, I can run
> some games I couldn't run 
> before. Plus, it will use Extreme in OSX. That, and
> it's the fastest card for 
> a PCI Mac, means I'm as satisfied as I can be, given
> the machines 
> limitations. I was curious about all the reports of
> "built in video", 
> benchmarking faster than vitually any card put in a
> PCI Mac. So, here's what 
> I saw. (My system specs listed at the end)
> 
> I ran the tests 1) using the ATI with acceleration
> off, 2) Accel on, 3)built 
> in video (disconnected monitor from ATI and plugged
> into built in card) I ran 
> video at 1152x870 @ 75Hz
> 
> I ran Nortons Video benchmarks without running the
> CPU, Disk or FPU tests. 
> Results:
> ATI off  1:00:95 (stopwatch)
> ATI on     :58:44 (stopwatch)
> Built in    :58:36 (stopwatch) notice that it was
> indeed quickest
> This was simple. I timed how long it took for
> Nortons to run the video tests.
> 
> Here's what Nortons reported for overall scores:
> ATI off     75.7
> ATI on    390.0
> Built in   537.0
> Interestingly, when I looked at the individual test
> items, It seemed that ATI 
> was faster in 6 of the 11 tests, and on three of
> them a whole lot quicker. 
> (Rectangles, Round/Rect & Scrolling) It would be
> interesting to see how they 
> weighted each test, and what each test actually was.
> 
> Just because, I ran the Video tests in MacBench 3.0
> Results:
>               Graphics Mix     Publishing Graphics
> Mix
> ATI off     27.53              17.66
> ATI on      96.23              63.72
> Built in     63.59              69.07
> The program didn't give individual test results, so
> could draw no conclusions.
> 
> Then I used Throughput, which test, well video
> throughput, I suspect. It 
> seems to time how long it moves data from Ram to
> Vram using 4 different 
> methods. Results:
>                  CPU          FPU            AltiVec
>             CopyBits
> ATI off     23.6            43.9             43.7   
>             43.3
> ATI on      23.6            43.9             43.7   
>             78.7
> Built in     57.0          112.8           112.6    
>          110.0
> Well, what do you make of this?
> 
> So, here are my conclusions. The benchmarks may not
> be taxing the video 
> system hard enough to show the ATI cards potential.
> Everybody agrees that you 
> can really see the difference in 3D mode. Secondly,
> I think that the PCI bus 
> may be really limiting the cards potential. It's
> really too bad we can't 
> somehow hook up the card to the VRAM slots. I think
> it would really scream 
> then. (Maybe that's what an AGP port really is)
> Obviously the built in video 
> is pretty darn good. Look at how much faster it
> moves video to and from the 
> VRAM, vs. the ATI. I'm impressed with Apples stock
> video system. Comments 
> anyone?
> 
> STeve
> 
> My system:
> 8600 w/XLR8/G4/450, Sonnett Tempo Trio, ATI Radeon,
> 20" SuperMac monitor, 1 
> Gig ram, OS9.1, QT 6.02, CarbonLib 1.6, ATI update
> 2.10
> 
> -- 
> PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by
> <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
> 
>  Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  |
> Refurbished Drives |
>  -- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169   |
>  & CDRWs on Sale!  |
> 
>       Support Low End Mac
> <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
> 
> PCI-PowerMacs list info:
> <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml>
>   --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
> Send list messages to:  
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, email:  
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For digest mode, email: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subscription questions: 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
> 
> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks!
> http://www.applelinks.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

-- 
PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 -- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169   |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

PCI-PowerMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to