I feel sheepish. Upon further inspection, the order in which I opened the screenshots got messed up somehow. I was agreeing with you all along without realizing it.
On 18/02/11 03:48 AM, PCMan wrote: > This is not something new. It's the old behavior since the first > version of PCManFM till the release of 0.5 series. PCManFM 0.9 > previously uses a different approach due to limitations of GTK+ but > now I overcome that limitation with some workarounds. > This kind of tab bar is similar to that of Firefox and can contain in > average two more tabs in the same space. > Unless most user are against this design, there is no plan to revert > this at the moment. The old PCManFM 0.5 series all use this style and > it seemed to be widely-accepted by users. > > Best regards > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Stephan Sokolow > <[email protected]> wrote: >> While, as a programmer, I understand the benefits to having a single >> sidebar outside the tab box rather than one sidebar for each tab page, I >> have to agree. The old tab bar positioning both gives more usable space >> for tab names. >> >> I could be wrong, but didn't the old positioning also simplify properly >> scoping the sidebar highlight/selection to the contents of the tab? >> >> Oh well. Merely a minor irritant for me. What really bothers me is that >> middle-clicking back/forward/up doesn't open a new tab. >> >> On 17/02/11 02:24 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> Hello! >>> Today I have upgraded to the latest version of PCManFM and noticed >>> that the tabs behaviour has suddenly changed. >>> Screenshot: >>> http://i15.fastpic.ru/big/2011/0217/47/ec08809154375fac55deaac05a600c47.png >>> >>> I liked the previous tabs behaviour much more and have already got used >>> to it. >>> Screenshot: >>> http://i15.fastpic.ru/big/2011/0217/42/d87523c17b06249c29caf8f6f5dc3c42.png >>> >>> So, I would like to revert to the old one. Please, tell me how can I do >>> that. >>> Thanks for help. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Vladimir >>> >>> ----- >>> <[email protected]> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >>> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >>> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >>> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> _______________________________________________ >> Pcmanfm-develop mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pcmanfm-develop >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Pcmanfm-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pcmanfm-develop
