------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=820 --- Comment #2 from Jing Lan <[email protected]> 2009-03-09 19:59:49 --- I was guessing there might be some in-compatible issue. Yet the result I got from my trial set seems not correct. If I make a rule with callout as: (test(?C1)) $0=ENTITY:callout:ADV/ADV The current callout function will only check string match, and the matching data only has two lines: CALL call And my testing data has a line as: a testcallOUT AND and testCALLOUT and friday With my patch, I got a <dnt_entity_callout pos="ADV/ADV">testcall</dnt_entity_callout>OUT AND and <dnt_entity_callout pos="ADV/ADV">testCALL</dnt_entity_callout>OUT and friday Without it, I got a <dnt_entity_callout pos="ADV/ADV">test</dnt_entity_callout>callOUT AND and <dnt_entity_callout pos="ADV/ADV">test</dnt_entity_callout>CALLOUT and friday It seems the pattern is correctly found, yet the end of re-writinng location is not correctly calculated. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
