Philip Hazel <[email protected]> писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:23:30 +0400:
>> >> What do you think about adding following PCRE behavior: >> >> >> >> The return code PCRE_ERROR_MULTISEGMENT raised, and matching abandons >> >> immediately if at any time during the matching process PCRE needs to >> >> check (not bumpalong) the next symbol of subject string, but >> discovers >> >> an end of string. An extra parameter - last_bumpalong_offset - is >> >> returned. > I have implemented a new option called PCRE_PARTIAL_HARD, which has this > behaviour, except that it returns PCRE_ERROR_PARTIAL because I did not > see the need to have a different return code. (I have also renamed > PCRE_PARTIAL as PCRE_PARTIAL_SOFT, but kept the old name as a synonym > for compatibility.) > All this work has now been committed to the subversion code repository, > with updated documentation. Thanx for great work. I read the changelog but dont find, that last bumpalong offset is returned. Is there? -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
