Am 19.01.2010 18:12, schrieb Philip Hazel: > On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Davide Libenzi wrote: > >> Anyway, whatever method you guys choose, it'd be good to have a way to >> build PCRE on Windows w/out installing extra software (like cmake). > You install hundreds of megabytes of M$ compilers but won't install cmake? > My reservation is that adding two more "config-like" files means that > there are then two more files that have to be updated when things > change. And things do change: new build-time options get added, and > occasionally a new source file comes along. At least with CMake I can > test a change under Linux, which gives me some hope that I've done it > right. :-) That's the point - it doesn't help anyone but makes more work for Philip.
CMake is good enough and pcre is not the only one which needs cmake on windows... Christian -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
