Hi, Philip, Thank you so much. Your reply is helpful.
2011/8/16 Philip Hazel <[email protected]>: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, I wrote: > >> I tried studying the combined pattern, assuming it would find a starting >> byte set of < o t and u (which is what studying does), but it didn't. >> This I think is a bug in pcre_study(), which I will investigate (just in >> time for the forthcoming 8.13 release). Looks like it is the initial \b >> in three patterns that is foxing it, because when I remove that, it does >> find the starting bytes. > > Yes, it was a simple bug, for which I have committed a patch. If you > study the pattern, the 8.13 release should be somewhat faster. With luck > this release might be out tomorrow. > > Philip > > -- > Philip Hazel > -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
