On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Ralf Junker wrote: > To accommodate changes in LINK_SIZE, would it be reasonable to redefine > COMPILE_WORK_SIZE like this: > > #define COMPILE_WORK_SIZE (4096 / 2 * LINK_SIZE)
That would only raise the maximum number of forward references from around 1500 in the LINK_SIZE=3 case to around 2000, the same as the LINK_SIZE=2 case. I do not think that really helps (ND has quoted examples with repeat counts of 35000.) Philip -- Philip Hazel -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
