On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, ND wrote: > >It applies to capturing, non-capturing, and atomic parentheses. However, > >the handling of MARKs is complicated; I hope I have caught all thecases. > > Thanx a lot, Philip. > Is there my first example take into account? There was a negative assertion: > > > > PCRE version 8.21 2011-12-12> /(?=a(*:x))(?!a(*:y)c)/K> ab> 0:> > > > > > > There is no MARK value in output. Expected> MK:x
Thanks for pointing that out; I had overlooked that case. I have now fixed that as well as an issue with positive assertions. Philip -- Philip Hazel -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
