On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Graycode wrote: > You're right. I hadn't thought anyone would use pcre_config() without > having pcre_exec().
Somebody might use pcre_config() and pcre_dfa_exec(). > > 6. I am not sure why your code allows for two additional ints. Where do > > they come from? > > The answer is in your question #5. There was another place where I saw > two ints on the stack above RMATCH() where #5 shows just one int. I looked and didn't spot that. Maybe the code has changed. Hmm. That is not good because it's something unpredictable. > In the patch I was using the address of a static variable as being the > equivalent of an option bit. I am doing experiments and I think I now know how to get at least the basic size. I will post again when I'm done. Philip -- Philip Hazel -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
