Le Samedi, 25 Février 2012 09:24:33 +0000 (GMT), Philip Hazel <[email protected]> a écrit :
> with a return code of 0. There is clearly some mystery here as to why > your version of the code is not right. If you email your pcredemo.c > to me (NOT to the list!) I will diff it to try shed some light. Apologies, I found the mistake. I've taken out these options from the empty string condition and always set them: options = PCRE_NOTEMPTY_ATSTART | PCRE_ANCHORED; Which gave the error since they were set when not needed. And for the pcre_fullinfo() bit, yes it's there. I've modified copies of the demo and mistaken these. So all's OK. And thanks for the comments. As I start to know more libpcre, it is quite great. Hopefully my eventual next question will make more sense ! ;-) -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
