The attached patch addresses the test failure quoted below, which appears
to be the result of differing directory ordering.
(Note that all other instances of "pcregrep -L -r" in RunGrepTest already
include a sort(1) invocation.)
Testing pcregrep version 8.32-RC1 2012-08-08
Testing pcregrep main features
--- /afs/teragram.com/user/dgomez/prog/pcre/testdata/grepoutput 2012-08-19
00:12:38.000000002 -0400
+++ testtry 2012-09-06 17:45:10.000000000 -0400
@@ -371,8 +371,8 @@
---------------------------- Test 34 -----------------------------
RC=2
---------------------------- Test 35 -----------------------------
-./testdata/grepinput8
./testdata/grepinputx
+./testdata/grepinput8
RC=0
---------------------------- Test 36 -----------------------------
./testdata/grepinput3
FAIL: RunGrepTest
===================
1 of 3 tests failed
===================
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
--Daniel
--
Daniel Richard G. || [email protected] || Software Developer
Teragram Linguistic Technologies (a division of SAS)
http://www.teragram.com/
Index: RunGrepTest
===================================================================
--- RunGrepTest (revision 1028)
+++ RunGrepTest (working copy)
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
echo "RC=$?" >>testtry
echo "---------------------------- Test 35 -----------------------------" >>testtry
-(cd $srcdir; $valgrind $pcregrep -L -r --include=grepinputx --include grepinput8 --exclude-dir='^\.' 'fox' ./testdata) >>testtry
+(cd $srcdir; $valgrind $pcregrep -L -r --include=grepinputx --include grepinput8 --exclude-dir='^\.' 'fox' ./testdata | sort) >>testtry
echo "RC=$?" >>testtry
echo "---------------------------- Test 36 -----------------------------" >>testtry
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
