------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1348 --- Comment #3 from Miklos Tirpak <[email protected]> 2013-04-18 09:44:19 --- Thank you very much for the quick help! Yes, I can use possessive quantifiers, and they speed up the match a lot, or better to say, the non-match. I will also lower the match and recursion limits to protect the system because I do not know in advance what kind of expressions the user will define. Thanks, Miklos On 04/17/2013 09:29 PM, Zoltan Herczeg wrote: > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug. > > http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1348 > > Zoltan Herczeg <[email protected]> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |[email protected] > > > > > --- Comment #2 from Zoltan Herczeg <[email protected]> 2013-04-17 > 20:29:43 --- > Can't you use possessive quantifiers here? > > [0-9a-fA-F#\*] intersect [\-\.\(\)] seems empty. > > ([0-9a-fA-F#\*]+[\-\.\(\)]?)* is the same as ([0-9a-fA-F#\*]++[\-\.\(\)])* > > -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
