Hi, I wanted to say something similar. Now PCRE cannot be built without UCP if UTF is enabled, but using it is a different question. You can modify the behavior of \w etc. in the same was as in PCRE1.
Regards, Zoltan "Giuseppe D'Angelo" <dange...@gmail.com> írta: >On 5 January 2015 at 17:57, Jean-Christophe Deschamps ><jch.descha...@free.fr> wrote: >> While this seems reasonnable at the first look, linking of these options has >> one unfortunate drawback: it dramatically changes the semantics of \w, \W, >> \b etc. and previously working patterns over UTF strings could produce >> different results. > >What do you mean? \w changes matching from ASCII to the Unicode >property if you compile the pattern with PCRE2_UCP (*). Those are >configure-time options to build PCRE2 itself with or without >Unicode/UCP support. > >(*) and if you're afraid of a (*UCP) inside a pattern, then there's >PCRE2_NEVER_UCP to always disable UCP. > >Cheers, >-- >Giuseppe D'Angelo > >-- >## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev > -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
