On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, [email protected] wrote:
> I'm building trunks for both pcre & pcre2
>
<snip>
> Should there be just an unversioned 'libpcre2.pc' and
> /usr/local/lib64/libpcre2.so as well?
>
> I'd suspect upstreams may attempt to default to libpcre2.{pc,so}, as for
> libpcre.
>
> Or, are there specific reasons NOT to?
This looks as if it's probably just an oversight. There's not reason for
doing anything "unusual". Thanks for the report. I will look into it.
Philip
--
Philip Hazel
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
