https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1642
Zoltan Herczeg <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Zoltan Herczeg <[email protected]> --- Interesting. Actually PCRE2 should use less memory than PCRE. Perhaps the compiler is "too" clever. Could you check that the following function is NOT inlined on your system: static int #ifdef __GNUC__ __attribute__ ((noinline)) #endif op_recurse_ovecsave(REGISTER PCRE2_SPTR eptr, PCRE2_SPTR callpat, PCRE2_SPTR mstart, PCRE2_SIZE offset_top, match_block *mb, eptrblock *eptrb, uint32_t rdepth) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
