On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Ralf Junker wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, but I had already understood. Maybe my question > was not quite clear? I will try to do better.
Oh, sorry. I did wonder if I was misunderstanding you. :-) > Put briefly: Are the results in testoutput18 as per PCRE2 SVN 362 correct? In > particular, for this section (line 61-65): > > /abc.def/ > *** Failers > No match: POSIX code 17: match failed > abc\ndef > No match: POSIX code 17: match failed > > I get a match instead of a failure. > > If the failure is the expected result, I must look at my code. If a match is > expected, testouput18 should be corrected. It should be a failure because \n does not match '.' by default. If you set the dotall modifier, it should match. Philip -- Philip Hazel -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
