On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Zoltán Herczeg <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand the basic principles, but I cannot judge the side effects and > limitations (CPU/OS/compiler) of those changes. It would be better to discuss > proposed patches and land the best solution.
The biggest problem is having this working (and claim as supported) amongst the huge number of compilers and platforms that PCRE2 runs on. That's not an easy task. I guess it's better to ask users to use read/write locking around matching and jit compiling. Or we could think of adding back APIs like pcre_study -- having the jit data returned as a separate piece of information... Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
