https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189
--- Comment #4 from Zoltan Herczeg <[email protected]> --- Hi, I am sorry for not doing anything with this bug, it issue should likely be closed by now. Unfortunately Dmitry only provided a pattern without input, so it is hard to tell whether it is fixed. Anyway, based on the description (date, pcre16 branch, jit specific), I suspect I mentioned the following patch: https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20111223.203732.252e5e68.en.html since \b depends on skip_char_back(). Do you see any difference with the output of those two commands? Unfortunately the person did not report the difference. There is one more thing I want to mention. Currently PCRE2-JIT improvements are ported back to PCRE1, which provides a nice speedup, but might also introduce errors. Regards, Zoltan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
