https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1803
--- Comment #26 from Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamu...@canonical.com> --- (In reply to Zoltan Herczeg from comment #24) > I think I figured out where the -1 comes from: when a pattern is rerun with > PCRE_NOTEMPTY_ATSTART | PCRE_ANCHORED, the JIT rejects it since it was > compiled without PCRE_ANCHORED flag (this flag is compiled into the machine > generated code). And the interpreter sets the -1. I could probably insert a breakpoint and remove PCRE_ANCHORED from the rerun to confirm this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
