Hi Philip, On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 08:50:55AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, Ervin Hegedüs via Pcre-dev wrote: > > > (Note, that there is a 3rd solution, we ignore the > > PCRE_STUDY_JIT_COMPILE flag, and uses pcre_study() without that...) > > And, it occurs to me overnight, there may be another "solution". Do you > actually use the values of the captured substrings?
I have to check it deeper, but as I remember, we're using them. > If all you are > interested in is whether or not the pattern matches, all you need to do > is change the test of the return code from > 0 to >= 0 and you are done. > Alternatively, set the PCRE_NO_AUTO_CAPTURE option on pcre_compile() and > it won't capture anything. thanks for this important note - but I think we can't follow this way :( a. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
