https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2513
Philip Hazel <p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Philip Hazel <p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk> --- It's a bit surprising that nobody has mentioned this before. :-) I cannot remember why it is this way, but I suspect I was not wanting to get too tangled up with the different line-ending conventions. However, giving it some more thought and noting that grep adds a newline has convinced me to make a change. I've just committed a patch that adds a line ending, taking note of the --newline setting. If anybody is relying on the old behaviour and grumbles, it will be easy enough to add an option to suppress this. Philosophical Question: does NL mean "start new line" or "end last line"? I suppose we treat it as both except at the very end of a file, where it isn't usually interpreted as introducing an empty line (which it would at the start). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev