Hi All, Is there also no fix for libusb 0.1 -> libusb 1.x upgrade that breaks Solaris 11 builds?
Thanks very much and Best Regards William To On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:25 AM, William To <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am building pcsc-lite on Solaris 11 because Oracle's version only works > on Solaris 10, but not on 11. I don't know why because I gave up trying to > make it work. > > It seems the Solaris-specific version added a lot of code to handle their > network stuff, and were broken on Solaris 11. > > So that's why I need to build it myself. > > Regards > > William To > > > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Ludovic Rousseau < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> 2016-05-13 7:58 GMT+02:00 William To <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >> >> Hello, >> >> >>> >>> Previously I did successfully built pcsc-lite 1.6.1 and ccid-1.3.13 >>> under Solaris 11 using the Sun Developer Studio compiler (cc). Since then, >>> there is a new requirement to use an USB PC/SC card reader that is not >>> supported by ccid-1.3.13 and is only supported at later versions. So I have >>> decided to try build pcsc-lite 1.8.14 and ccid 1.4.21 under Solaris 11. >>> This time I decided to ditch cc and use gcc 4.9.2 from opencsw instead. >>> >>> Here the brick walls I am hitting now : >>> >>> 1. Using the following configuration options : >>> env MAKE=gmake NM=gnm STRIP=gstrip RANLIB=granlib >>> LIBUSB_CFLAGS="-I/usr/include" LIBUSB_LIBS="-L/usr/lib -lusb" >>> SYMBOL_VISIBILITY="-fvisibility=default" ./configure --prefix=/usr/local >>> --enable-debugatr --disable-libusb >>> (libusb on Solaris 11.3 seems incompatible with pcsc-lite so I had to >>> disable it) >>> >>> When I build with "gmake" afterwards, this is what I got: >>> >>> Undefined first referenced >>> symbol in file >>> SCardListReaders testpcsc.o >>> SCardSetAttrib testpcsc.o >>> SCardGetAttrib testpcsc.o >>> g_rgSCardRawPci testpcsc.o >>> SCardReconnect testpcsc.o >>> SCardFreeMemory testpcsc.o >>> SCardDisconnect testpcsc.o >>> SCardReleaseContext testpcsc.o >>> SCardIsValidContext testpcsc.o >>> SCardEstablishContext testpcsc.o >>> SCardGetStatusChange testpcsc.o >>> SCardListReaderGroups testpcsc.o >>> SCardStatus testpcsc.o >>> pcsc_stringify_error testpcsc.o >>> SCardControl testpcsc.o >>> SCardConnect testpcsc.o >>> g_rgSCardT1Pci testpcsc.o >>> g_rgSCardT0Pci testpcsc.o >>> SCardTransmit testpcsc.o >>> >>> Using objdump I can see that the libpcsclite.so.1 just built hides the >>> symbols above. So problem 1 is how should I configure the build so that gcc >>> will not hide the symbols by default? I tried the >>> "SYMBOL_VISIBILITY="-fvisibility=default" and that does not work. >>> >> >> This problem was also reported in >> https://github.com/LudovicRousseau/PCSC/issues/4 >> >> A possible fix is >> https://github.com/risto3/PCSC/commit/2176d782188a9ff4453ae24556a340b2c8f549cf >> I have not yet tested and integrated it (no free time). >> >> Does it work for you? >> >> After changing the src/Makefile to stop hiding the symbols, the build can >>> continue, and then hit this brick wall: >>> >>> CC pcscd-configfile.o >>> configfile.l: In function âDBGetReaderListDirâ: >>> configfile.l:295:16: error: âstruct direntâ has no member named âd_typeâ >>> if (direntry->d_type == DT_UNKNOWN) >>> ^ >>> configfile.l:295:28: error: âDT_UNKNOWNâ undeclared (first use in this >>> function) >>> if (direntry->d_type == DT_UNKNOWN) >>> ^ >>> configfile.l:295:28: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only >>> once for each function it appears in >>> configfile.l:314:17: error: âstruct direntâ has no member named âd_typeâ >>> if (direntry->d_type != DT_REG) >>> ^ >>> configfile.l:314:29: error: âDT_REGâ undeclared (first use in this >>> function) >>> if (direntry->d_type != DT_REG) >>> >>> >>> Problem 2 is I think the dirent.h under Solaris 11 is incompatible with >>> the pcscd-config file. Is there anything I can do about this? >>> >> >> Fixed upstream in >> https://github.com/LudovicRousseau/PCSC/commit/fa52ae4e1f1ae3c35596e9aedaa3ce30fc5ceef9 >> >> Why are people building pcsc-lite on Solaris? >> Oracle (ex-Sun) does not provide its own version of pcsc-lite any more? >> >> Bye >> >> -- >> Dr. Ludovic Rousseau >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pcsclite-muscle mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pcsclite-muscle >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pcsclite-muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pcsclite-muscle
