I've never tried cacheman that I can recall. You only need a controller card if the HD is going to be UDMA 66 or 100. This is assuming the mobo is UDMA 33. If it's 66 and you get a UDMA 66 drive, then you still don't need a controller card. Of course they are backward compatible so you don't HAVE to get a controller card if you mobo is udma 33 and the HD is not. I just got a Promise Ultra100TX2, since my mobo is only UDMA 66 and my HD is UDMA 100, but more importantly because of what I heard here that the integrated controller on my mobo does not like win2k. -Clint God Bless Us All http://orpheuscomputing.com Clint Hamilton, Owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Aronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 12:33 PM 9/15/01 -0400, you wrote: >Barry, > >Just as information. While these motherboards have an additional ATA >66/100 ide controller built in, the system identifies the controller as an >scsi controller and the disk drives as scsi drives even though they aren't. >The additional controller from Highpoint or Promise was added to many bx >motherboards and some Via chipset motherboards whose main chipset didn't >support the ata 66/100 drive protocol. They would give you some higher >speeds and, of course the ability to connect a bunch of ide drives. My main >system on an MSI694 motherboard has a promise controller built in and is >running 7 ide devices without having to add a controller card. None of these >provide the performance of a true scsi controller. Now, many motherboards >are being produce with built in raid controllers and they do give you some >definite performance benefits. > >Ben Moore > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Barry Aronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 11:22 AM >Subject: Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? > > > > Clint! Do you have a third party utility such as "Cacheman"? The >version > > 5 is quite extensively built. Also You confused me quite a bit as by your > > description of your IDE setup as actually SCSI. As you may remember I >have > > had a SCSI system for years and it truly is night and day between SCSI and > > their additional formats and EIDE or IDE or ATAPI etc. There is a > > different electrical setup and pin connection. While on the subject Ben, your board is a dual processor one as I understand it. You mentioned that some boards do not support ATA66/100 as mine does not, as far as I have been told. When i purchased my board I thought it was "state of the art" LOL Now I have to come to understand that the board was "state of the art" for about 2 months. I am going to install Win2K Pro very soon but have been hesitant about it because of my processor and Mobo. PII 400 MHz SCSI Adaptec AIX7880 controller onboard Soltek SL67A-C motherboard 440 BX chipset. I also wanted to buy a new hard drive but am in a quandary as to purchasing a controller card to be able to maximize performance. My RAM is all PC100 equalled to 256 MB In your experience what do you think is my best course and of course economical as well :)? ============= PCWorks Mailing List ================= Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines & make sure you've followed proper posting procedures, http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com =====================================================
Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Clint Hamilton Tue, 18 Sep 2001 03:15:53 -0700
- PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Clint Hamilton
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? Ben Moore
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? Barry Aronson
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? Ben Moore
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? Ben Moore
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? Barry Aronson
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 exper... [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Clint Hamilton
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Clint Hamilton
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? Ben Moore
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 experts? Barry Aronson
- Re: PCWorks: Windows 2000 exper... Ben Moore
