Peter, that was as high as the table went; http://onlinehelp.bc.ca/tips.htm#scandisk Up to 8 gb 4K clusters 8 to 16 gb 8K clusters 16 to 32 gb 16K clusters 32 to 64 gb 32K clusters
What it says on that page is not correct: "The cluster size can be corrected by booting the computer with a Windows startup disk and reformatting the drive with the format program on the startup disk." I did that, and it still shows 4k cluster size for a 17.2gb HD. Something else odd, on MY pc, I have two 20gb ATA133 drives on a RAID stripe (which is a total of only 20gb) and they have 32k clusters! -Clint God Bless Us All Clint Hamilton, Owner http://OrpheusComputing.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Kaulback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 9:29 AM Subject: Re: PCWorks: "not enough memory to run scandisk" regardless Hello Greg, Do you have an extension for this table? As in what cluster size FAT32 must have with a 160 gb hard drive? Going by this table FAT32 would require 128k clusters for that drive size I don't use FAT32 any more, unless I install a win9x, and haven't dealt with 64k clusters since NT. Interesting. Peter Kaulback In the hour of 09:48 AM 4/14/2002 -0400, Greg M spoke this: > > Hard disk size Cluster size > > ------------------------------- > > 16 GB and larger 16 KB ============= PCWorks Mailing List ================= Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines & make sure you've followed proper posting procedures, http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com =====================================================
