It's a long story about the old hosts (too long to go into here) but suffice to say, they without any word CANNED myself and at least one other person's site for no reason, other than they were too stupid to fix a continuing email problem. STAY AWAY from these jerks! www.nomonthlyfees.com
Since we needed new hosts immediately, I happen to get an email from www.openhsp.com or http://openhsp.com/ (in some areas, you cannot use the www prefix for some reason and for other areas you MUST use it!) http://openhsp.com/index.php?go=services It was perfect timing and only $4.95 a month, free 30 day trial. Same features as old hosts, but the site's pages load MUCH faster and email is several times faster, and they are also MUCH more reliable. They are also very nice and the people at no monthly fees are a bunch of jerk-imbeciles who don't belong in the biz. They don't know what they are doing and are very incompetent. I have nothing but horror stories regarding them. -Clint God Bless Us All Clint Hamilton, Owner http://OrpheusComputing.com � http://Computer-Hardware-Sales-Consumer-Electronics-Sales.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Kaulback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> With all hosts I've worked with in the past they lock down the sub folders, be it IIS, Apache, WebStar, or any other web server. So which host did you decide to go with Clint, and why? Peter Kaulback In the hour of 08:43 AM 6/12/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke this: >That is for indexing or no indexing in search engines for >html web pages. I think what Harold means is this for >example: >http://orpheuscomputing.com/images4/ >This is one of my images folders. As you can see, anyone can >see that link. He wants it to where that URL would be >"forbidden". Mine used to be like that on my old hosts, but >since the move to my new hosts, I haven't gotten around yet >to changing the permissions of the images folders. :) (I >posted earlier how he can fix this). >-Clint > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Peter Kaulback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Harold, this is the Robots Meta Tag you may be speaking of. >If you have it set: ><meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow"> >Then robots will not index your site. More info is here: >http://www.robotstxt.org/wc/meta-user.html > >Peter Kaulback > >In the hour of 10:57 PM 6/11/2002 -0400, Harold B. spoke >this: > > >Hi fellow PCWorkers, > > > >I need some help with HTML. I once knew the tag but have >misplaced it. > >Question: Does > >anyone know the tag for stopping a viewer from getting into >the JPG Index > >of a web > >site? > > > >You know you can usually get to this index by removing the >last part of > >the URL > >(usually if it is a jpg), and hopefully you will get to the >File Index (or > >sometimes a > >gallery of jpg's). > > > >If you know this tag, you might send it to me in private >email (unless you > >think it > >might be of interest to the group).. > > > >Harold B. ============= PCWorks Mailing List ================= Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines & make sure you've followed proper posting procedures, http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com =====================================================
