I know it is dubious considering the MS and virtual memory relationship with 9x but that doesn't exist with NT/2k/XP. The NTFS journaling file system works nicely with moving the swap file around. I had to do it a lot when I was using Photoshop, it doesn't like to have it's scratch disks on the same partition as the swap file, that can be a slow system :)

So from my experience it does know, and even better it remembers too :)

Now if they could add the journaling file system from BeOS to windows everything would be even faster :)

Peter Kaulback

In the hour of 03:58 AM 10/03/2003 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke this:
Thanks for the info & links Peter.  I've already done that
registry tweak a few days ago.  So, how is the swap filed
CHANGED from one area to another?  If I disable it on C:, and
place the pagefile on another drive, will it use it
automatically?  It knows to look for it on the other HD, or
another partition?  I know where that area is via device
manager for changing VM settings, but from the looks of it,
since from that area you can put a pagefile on each drive or
partition, it doesn't look like it 'knows' to use the pagefile
for ALL drives or for all partitions.
-Clint

God Bless Us All
Clint Hamilton, Owner
Want to exchange links with us?
http://OrpheusComputing.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kaulback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

If you have 1024 mb ram installed you can turn off the swap
file, though
some software and/or games may fail. XP writing to multiple
swap files on
the same drive can slow the system, I don't remember the exact
numbers I'll
have to look that up. The swap file works best when it is
static and on a
separate drive and even better on a separate controller too.
Though if you
have a dynamic volume spanning all your disks and controllers
this would be
redundant :) Having one static swap file setup on a separate
partition,
preferably by itself, can lead to decreased fragmentation
(which occurs
more slowly in NTFS) in the partition and in the swap file
itself.

XP can see up to 4gb of memory so if you have it then you
might as well use
it. Also with a large amount of ram installed you might want
to increase
your performance by locking the kernel in the ram. Open
regedit and drill
down to "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\
SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session
Manager\Memory Management", Highlight DisablePagingExecutive
in the right
pane. Then go to on Edit / Modify and enter the value 1. Click
OK, close
Regedit, and reboot.

MS has some things to say about the partitioning idea's:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;314482
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;314482

Plus other sites
http://www.techadvice.com/win2000/p/page-file_w2k.htm

Have fun!

Peter Kaulback

In the hour of 03:41 AM 08/03/2003 -0600,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
spoke this:
>That goes against everything I've ever heard about swap files
>(at lease with '98).  If you know, please elaborate on how a
>swap file on each partition can slow XP down, I'm very
>interested in knowing about that.  (I formatted using NTFS).
>I would think that with each partition using it's OWN swap
>file, would help performance.  Also, I've heard that placing
>the
>SF on a separate partition and formatting it as FAT16 is
good.
>That must be only on '98. ?  I currently use 512mb DDR, but
>since (from what I have read) XP can see more, I'll probably
>go with 1024mb total.  If you know of a definitive website on
>this matter, that would be great.
>Thanks Peter,
>-Clint
>

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Peter Kaulback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>In the hour of 04:08 AM 06/03/2003 -0600,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>spoke this:
> >Does anyone know how to MOVE the virtual memory swap file
in
> >XP Pro?  I was able to do this in '98 & ME, but in XP Pro,
>you
> >don't appear to be able to put your swap file on a separate
> >partition.  Now I have a useless "swap file" partition.
> >
> >Looking at that area, I see that only the C: drive (windows
> >partition) has a swap file (page file).  Is it advantageous
>to
> >add a swap file to each partition?  I have C=windows,
D=(now
> >useless) swap file, E=Program files, F=temp net files,
> >G=Storage.  If it is advantageous, should you let windows
> >manage it or make it custom size which IS advantageous on
ME
>&
> >'98?
> >Thanks,
> >-Clint
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to