OH, NOW I see why!  No wonder....you're getting the digest
version, you never mentioned that before.  I of course understand
now why you have to paste the subject line in.  Yes, you'll have
to keep doing that, you can still just click 'reply', and I'd
just prefix the subject line with an "Re:" so all will know it's
a reply to a post, then just highlight and delete all of the
other non-applicable posts in the digest.  You don't need to type
"new subject name" because a new subject is already implied by
it's presence, and the "was......" being added after it.

If I understand you correctly about the spacing; it appears you
don't have your text wrap set correctly.  It appears to be set to
too many characters (mine is set to 62 in OE).  But this also
depends on the size of the preview pane one has set.  It can be
dragged horizontally left or right.  If it's too small, even with
text wrap set small you'll still get the odd spaced lines.  If
you drag your 'separator bar' (I don't know what else to call it)
left or right, you'll see different sentence structure.  They way
you see email is not always the way others see it.  It also
depends on the font style you're using.
-Clint

God Bless Us All
Clint Hamilton, Owner
Want to exchange links with us?
http://OrpheusComputing.com �

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harold B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 07:23:46 -0600
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: PCWorks: Re: Multiple HTML corrections in a
website's many  pages.
>
> Why do you need to copy the subject line?  My Harold, what
email
> program are you using??  LOL!  I show you're using Netscape,
and
> it like OE is the same; by default, all you do is click 'reply'
> and the original email and subject are all intact as was in the
> original email.

I need to copy (or enter a new subject line as I did in this
posting), because I don't get individual emails from PCWorks.
Instead, I get the
digested form which has a "PCWorks" subject.

> Look at these screen shots (reduced in size and
> color depth).  The first is what any OE or NS email user will
see
> when clicking 'reply'.  Note the subject line is already there,
> intact, as it was originally, and with Re: prefixed to it.  (I
> believe in NS the signature file [if any] is placed at the
> extreme bottom of a thread).  The original email one is
replying
> to can be seen by scrolling down in the email a bit, which is
the
> result in the 2nd screen shot.
> http://orpheuscomputing.com/images4/Clipboard01.gif
> http://orpheuscomputing.com/images4/Clipboard02.gif
>
> That one of yours looks fine, so I don't know what that other
> post of yours meant about 'text being scattered all over the
> place'.  :-)

By "being scattered all over the place" I was referring to the
sentences being aligned properly, each word following the other
as one should in a
paragraph. Instead, what I see in my copy are irregular sentences
when typing directly into the email reply window. An example
would be the original
message below which looks like (in my Netscape email window like
it was typed in a tornado). Not always, so I'm wondering what
this one will look
like.

> Top replies or bottom replies are subjective to the
> sender.  But you should keep the email address of the sender in
> your replies in case a private email is ever warranted, and all
> will know no who wrote it.  Yes, it would have made sense and
be
> ok to change the subject line in this case, but the best thing
to
> do is prefix the original subject with something like "new
> subject name - was Re: whatever", that way threads can be
> followed by subject in the archives. ... Clint

Subject was entered as you suggested (looks like a heck of a long
subject line; wondering how it will look in the Digest
newsletter)
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to