Cling, you are right again. I get the PCWorks Digest and I thought your
commnet was directed to me. What happened in this case (your Thu, 15 Jun
2006 post, http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12424.html)
was that I first saw 1) your remark, "No one is forcing you to read them,"
followed by 2) the remark I now reasize you were directing your comment to,
followed by 3) my question to you. The fact that my question (3) was
included as a thread in that posting made me think you were responding to
me. If you look at it, it could be interpreted that way.
Regarding these Secunia Research vulnerability reports, it's just something
else that will, if I let it, take me away from the beautiful weather we are
having here in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn. I 'gotta' get out on the boards
(that's what we call the boardwalk) and do some jogging/powerwalking,
whatever I can do, and leave the secunia reseach the more sophisticated
computer users. --- Harold
From: "Support-OrpheusComputing.com" >
<clip> You need to not only look at the reply, but WHAT a reply is FOR and
TO whom. <snip>
If not, maybe here: <http://secunia.com/secunia_research/> or here:
<http://secunia.com/about_secunia_advisories/> <snip>
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12430.html>: It
> amazes me how remarks can be picked up the wrong way... <snip>
PS. No question about it and it's happened many times even here in PCWorks.
It happens every day in the millions of emails going through cyberspace ...
(misunderstandings). It's difficult enough in face-to-face talk to be
clearly understood; all the more so in email where it's a greater challenge.
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================
