On Aug 12, 2006, at 4:32 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Miller Puckette wrote:
This sounds like a good idea... I'd say just do it and we'll see how
we like the result!
BTW, I'm guessing you'll have to do something to get pd-devel to
believe
the messages are coming from a legit user.
i'll manage that as soon as it is agreed to accept these emails to
pd-dev and i know the email address that is used as a sender.
it need not be a legit user, just a valid (and constant) email
address.
i am basically fine with sending these emails to pd-dev; however pd-
cvs might be even better esp. for people who want to follow pd-dev
but are not at all interested in compile-problems of certain code.
pd-cvs is already targetted at people who might be also interested
in what the cvs-changes actually mean at compile time.
That makes sense. So pd-cvs would be the list for automated emails.
But I would suggest that devs actively committing should all be on pd-
cvs since they can break compilation.
.hc
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
