> and that is the question: why do we necessarily need the fftw based > fft-objects in plain pd and cannot use externals?
> so the only drawback is see is: the objects are called [fftw~] instead of > [fft~]; but lo and behold, i vaguely remembered krzysztof magic in cyclone, > where a newly > loaded class raises itself over an already existing class. while he is using > it to overwrite objects from other externals (e.g. iemmatrix's [matrix~]), i > don't see any > reason why this should not work with internals. > > et voila, does this not sound good? sounds good. maybe there should be some official policy on the overloading of internals? > > mfg.adsr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > PD-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
