Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2006, at 10:13 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > >> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Thomas Grill wrote: >> >>> currently there's no low-priority messaging in Miller's pd version, >>> but there is in the devel branch. It's one of the features that have >>> been there for some time and i'm trying to provide a patch for >>> Miller, so that it can make it into vanilla PD some time in the >>> future. Hopefully the auto-discard mechanism of the patch tracker >>> will blow up before that time. Don't expect the feature to be >>> available soon. >> >> So, how does one use that feature? >> >> Is it that all the audio is high-priority and all the non-audio is >> low-priority? > > Isn't that basically the way it is now? Correct me if I am wrong, but > isn't audio data processed first in each cycle, then message data? >
just think: - if you have a lot of audio calculations going on, does the message engine stutter? - if you have a lot of message calculations going on, does the audio engine stutter? so which part of pd is higher prioritized: messages or audio? and oh, you can have priorities even without threads... fmga.sdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
