Eric Lyon wrote:
> Thank you Thomas, hc and others for helpful feedback. The function I'm
> deferring is doing asynchronous DSP, not messaging. Essentially a


hi.
since pd-0.40 you can do DSP-on-demand, by banging the [switch~] object.
i have not tested, but it might be, that this DSP-operation is in the
message queue.
while i doubt that it is a good idea to put dsp-on-demand operations
into a separate thread with the currently available means
([detach]/[join]), it might get you into the right direction.

mfg.adsr
IOhannes

_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to