That's great! About the configure.ac stuff, I probably shouldn't have included those changes in the submitted patch. However, as a separate issue, those changes were necessary for me get OSCx to compile against the Pd.app bundle. Any chance on making similar configure.ac changes that won't break Pd-extended?
Steve On 1/1/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I committed it without the changes to configure.ac since those broke the Pd-extended build stuff. We'll see tomorrow whether it builds on Windows... .hc On Dec 28, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Stephen Sinclair wrote: Hi, I did this patch quickly because I needed it. The changes are _very_ simple, so I have some confidence that it should work. Some quick tests under Linux and OS X showed that it was working. I haven't tried the patch under Windows. (Never compiled Pd under Windows actually.) Testing the TTL parameter is not so easy... you need to test several ranges of subnets. Setting it to 0 showed that a message could be sent to localhost but not to another computer on the subnet, so that at least supports the theory that it works. But I haven't tried it over the internet. By the way, I made the changes based on this tutorial: http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/undergrad/4ba2/multicast/antony/index.html Testing it with Max/MSP's " net.multi.send/receive" objects produced some garbage... I'm not sure what that was all about. But testing it with Max 4.6's udpsend/receive objects worked fine. Another change I'd like to make is to have sendOSC support some arugments for port/host instead of having to send it the "connect" message, but I thought that kind of change would be out of this patch's scope. Let me know if anyone has comments or criticisms, I'd be happy to make changes and re-submit the patch. Steve On 12/28/06, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This patch adds multicast support to the OSCx libs, it looks useful, > but I don't really use OSC, so I couldn't say if its worth taking or > not: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? > func=detail&aid=1612910&group_id=55736&atid=478072 > > Shall we trying it in the nightly test builds? Anyone willing to > vouch for this patch so that it can be included in the next release? > > .hc > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://at.or.at/hans/
_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
