On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 13:55 +0100, Georg Holzmann wrote: > > Of course we would loose the possibility that everyone can quickly > fix > > a bug everywhere, but then, I don't see this as such a big problem. > > There still would be "trusted core developers" with access to almost > > everything - or maybe we could let each user decide with an ACL file > > in her/his user directory, who should have access to it. > > I think this is only a good idea if there were already problems, that > other developers broke things ... which I cannot really remember. > If not, it will only prevent some people from developing, trying to > improve other code, improving the build system etc.
iirc, carmen once messed with the plugin~ help files, which was not in everyone's interest. > I see your point, but I think this is more appropriate for a project, > where you really have some core developers (or maintainers) which > work > quite a lot on the code - but I don't think that it is like that in > pd! > (exception: millers main, maybe the pd-extended-release branch from > hans > and pd-devel-core) it would have the advantage, that there is a certain amount of quality assurance, so no one messes with other people's code ... but i guess your observation is correct, currently the cvs is not used as version control system, but rather as a code publishing system. tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk Which is more musical, a truck passing by a factory or a truck passing by a music school? John Cage
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
