Haha, please look at the first message in (or the subject of) this thread... we have gone far off topic : )
Yes, the counter proposal bit was a jab at the fact that the lazy consensus has been a bit too lazy, and if the consensus is that I am rejected perhaps a counter-proposal (for my rejection) is needed to confirm that, lazily. Finally, does anyone have any opinions on http://code.google.com as a cantidate? It would perhaps lighten your load, IOhannes (in that you wouldn't have to assemble the server at IEM). Luke On 3/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi. > > Quoting "Luke Iannini (pd)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > OK, well if this is not quite ready to be discussed, could someone at > > least add me to the dev list? > > man, this _is_ the dev list! > > > (or write a counter proposal for my non > > admission : )) > > as hans has often pointed out, pd-community mainly decides on a "lazy > consensus". > > > i was not aware that you have applied for repositry dev access (but i > generally leave this to the other, more "organized" admins) > > mfg.asdr > IOhannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
