On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> Hey, >> > > hi > >> >> Luckily, CVS is designed to do this: >> >> "13. Tracking third-party sources" >> http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.12.9/cvs_13.html > > ;-) > my only comment on this is that i won't comment it. > >> >> I am not particular about the name of the section, I am thinking >> "win32_sources". Comments, feedback, etc.? > > so what happens if (after some time) you notice that other OS's will > profit from the packages in win32_sources too? > will the package "foobar" live in both "win32_sources" and > "linux64_sources"? > or will the linux-stuff also live in "win32_sources"? > > i'd rather vote for "3rdparty" or something along these lines.
I am fine with a different name. But I have to say, I think we should try to avoid using these sources for anything else but Win32. Right now, the policy with the auto- build farms is that the deps need to be in that platform's package management. MinGW has no package management beyond the basic tools, hence this repository. .hc > > > mfg.asdr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > PD-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Mistrust authority - promote decentralization. - the hacker ethic _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
