On Jul 12, 2007, at 11:33 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Peach wrote: >> IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >>> nevertheless i think it might be very good if i could distinguish >>> between the 3 "types" of timetags) >>> >>> >> That's a difficult problem. What's the difference between zero and >> zero? >> I mean how does one tag no delay as being different from a delay >> of zero >> without adding another outlet? > > OK, I changed packOSC to output negative delays and it's now > obvious, even on the same machine a "current" time tag always has a > slight negative delay, whereas an "immediate" time tag is always > exactly zero. > That leaves the slight problem of a "future" message that arrives > exactly on time... > Martin
Wow, nice work! That sounds like it'll be quite easy to use timetags now. Is there anyway to generate timetags with Pd yet? .hc > > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a more direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in practice, it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
