Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >>> 3) I found the source to OSCx on SourceForge, but it looks ancient >>> (i.e. from 2002), which includes it's own statically-linked (and >>> very old) version of libosc. Is that really the latest release? >>> I'm thrilled that PD makes working with MIDI so easy, but I am >>> going to want to use OSC too.
>> This part of your post really confuses me. The OSCx stuff works quite >> well. Why is it a problem that the code is "old"? probably because it is not maintained but buggy? >> By the way there is a "new" OSC implementation in the "mrpeach" >> folder, take a look if you are worried about OSCx. For the record >> though, I've been using sendOSC and dumpOSC for quite some time now >> and they work very well. i was fine with the OSCx objects, until i tried to send a big (not a _really big_ message, just _big_) message and it crashed. see my bug report on this. > > Hey, > > I am curious, does OSCx implement time tagging at all? IIRC, that's > one of the advantages of mrpeach's OSC objects. and that is another reason why mrpeach's objects are more interesting. mgfa.frt IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev