Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > About desiredata, as Matju stated, the plan is to not remain in > synch with the code, but instead be compatible (sounds like a good idea, > by the way). Therefore, it probably makes sense to have desiredata in > it's own repository. But I suppose there is not harm done having a > 'desiredata' trunk.
all the harm that is possible to do is done by this! what is the benefit if the code is maintained outside and there is an outdated revision in "trunk"? i don't see a reason why desiredata should move out again into a separate repository, unless they wish to do so. (and if you feel like you must import upstream code, it should be imported into a tag; it can then be referenced via the svn:externals; btw, svn:externals can also reference code outside _this_ repository (at least if it is in a subversion repository)) fmga.sdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
